

Monday, May 5 – AP prep
Tuesday, May 6 – AP prep
Wednesday, May 7 – AP prep
Thursday, May 8– AP prep
Friday, May 9 – In The World is Flat, read Chap. One (3-50) “While I Was Sleeping”
Monday, May 12 – Read pp. 51-77 Flatteners 1 and 2
Tuesday, May 13 - Read pp. 77-126 Flatteners 3 and 4
Wednesday, May 14 – Read pp. 127-166 Flatteners 5-7
Thursday, May 15– Read pp. 167-199 Flatteners 8-10
Friday, May 16— Read pp. 200-232 “The Triple Convergence”
Contemporary History paper
This paper assignment will be a combination of research, analysis, and opinion. We are going back to one of the major questions of the course: who gets to write history?
You are going to choose a topic below and discuss the role the media played in the writing of the history of that particular event. By "media," I mean television, radio (including talk radio), newspapers (both mainstream and tabloid), magazines, the Internet, movies, and plays. (Of course, not all of these media are applicable in each case.) By "writing the history of a particular event," I mean both at the time the event was unfolding and also in the years after the event has concluded (some of these events have had more time to play out than others). For example, has there been a revision in the perception of the event as a result of the media in the time since the event?
I am NOT looking for an historical recap of what happened, although you will, of course, have to include specifics and details from the event itself. You are going to focus on the role the media played in the writing of that turn of events.
What role did the media play in writing the history of one of these events:
| McCarthyism and the Army-McCarthy hearings (during the Truman and Eisenhower administrations) | |
| The Cuban Missile Crisis (during the Kennedy administration) | |
| The Watergate scandal (during the Nixon administration) | |
| The Iran-Contra scandal (during the Reagan administration) | |
| The Iranian hostage crisis (during the Carter administration) | |
| The 1990 Gulf War (during the Bush administration) | |
| The Monica Lewinsky affair (during the Clinton administration) (You can refer to the impeachment hearings only briefly) | |
| The presidential impeachment hearings and trial (during the Clinton administration) (You will have to give some Lewinsky background, but the focus should be on the impeachment itself) | |
| The controversial 2000 presidential election (Bush v. Gore) | |
| The 2004 presidential election (Bush v. Kerry) | |
| Events leading up to the Iraq War (during the Bush administration) (Focus on the events leading up to the invasion of Iraq, not since the end of fall of Baghdad) |
Here is also something different about this paper: you may team up with one other person to do the research and writing of the paper. A word of caution: be wary about teaming up with someone who will not carry his or her weight. If you team up, both people will receive the same grade on the paper. This paper is due Wednesday, Dec. 12. The suggested length is 5-8 pages. Use proper citation and bibliography form. You should use a collection of reasoned and balanced sources.
World War II contracts
You are going to choose one of the projects on World War II below. The due date is Friday, Oct. 8. The project counts the same as a paper. High standards and quality will be expected, just as they are on papers. Find time to talk to me about your project before you begin it. This counts as half of a paper grade (50 pts.).
Suggested length: 4-5 pages
Due date: Thursday, Sept. 29
Our first paper was both analytical and persuasive, based on the summer reading. Another type of paper you need to be familiar with is the research-based paper. You are going to do a research paper with a few twists.
I would like you to investigate one agency or organization or piece of legislation associated with FDR’s New Deal. But I don’t want this to be simply research; that might be too boring. I want you to examine some of the following questions regarding that agency or organization (and other questions that might occur to you):
q How effective was this agency or legislation? Was it more noteworthy for its successes or failures? Were its successes more in substance or in style and public relations? Does it leave any legacy? Are there equivalent agencies or legislation today? How meaningful do you see this agency? What is legacy of this agency in the Toledo area or other parts of Ohio?
But please, do NOT run through these questions and write a sentence or two for each one. Too formulaic.
What I’d rather not see is this: the first 2/3 of the paper is your research, and the final third is a commentary on the effectiveness, etc., of the agency. Instead, try to weave your personal commentary and analysis throughout the paper. Is that tougher? Yes, but much more interesting to read. Feel free to use the “I” pronoun as you evaluate the program.
You need to have at least five sources cited in your paper: at least two on-line sources (Web sites), at least one magazine or newspaper article (either in print or through an online database, such as INFOhio), and at least two book or print sources (only one of which can be a reference source, such as an encyclopedia). You MUST use proper endnote and bibliography form; use Write for College for this purpose (use MLA endnote form in that book). I will make deductions for improper form.
Possible agencies to choose from: Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA), Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Public Works Administration (PWA), Civil Works Administration (CWA), Works Progress Administration (WPA), Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), Home Owner’s Refinancing Act (HOLC), National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), Glass-Steagall Banking Reform Act (FDIC), National Housing Act (FHA), Authorization for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Wagner Act (NLRB – National Labor Relations Board), Social Security Act, Soil Conservation Act, Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), National Recovery Administration (NRA), National Youth Administration (NYA), Federal Theater Project (part of the WPA), Federal Writers’ Project (part of the WPA), Rural Electrification Administration (REA). No more
Write a well-reasoned paper on the following topic. Use textual examples for support. Suggested length is 4-5 pages, double-spaced, 1” margins, 12 pt. font. Due date is Thursday, Aug. 30.
Eric Schlosser and John Steinbeck take two different approaches to evoking and understanding a time and critical situation in America. For one thing, Schlosser takes a journalistic approach to his topic (although it’s not pure journalism, is it?), while Steinbeck’s book is a book of fiction set in a specific time period in American history. Yet they both deal to some degree with an underclass of American citizens, and they both represent a form of historical writing.
Consider the techniques Steinbeck and Schlosser use to write history. What can a journalistic book of non-fiction do that fiction cannot? What can fiction do that a journalistic book of non-fiction cannot? Why would each be an effective choice in each case (since the two topics are very different)? What is the author trying to do in each case? Think about the specific techniques the writer uses to make points (use examples to support your points). Offer your own analysis of each technique. Include a thesis statement early in your paper (often found at the end of the opening paragraph). Are there other works of either fiction or non-fiction that are comparable?
So select one of the books and treat it as a historical work. Using the questions above (and others that come to your mind) as a springboard, analyze that book as a historical work, in terms of content, purpose, and style (technique).
In terms of citations, all you need to use are endnotes (not superscripted footnotes and not notes at the bottom of the page). Normally endnotes appear at the end of the sentence with the author’s name and the page number and no comma between them: (Steinbeck 261) Since you are only using the Steinbeck and Schlosser books, you do not need to include the author’s name for this paper, just the page number. In addition, do not let quotations stand on their own; quotations need a lead-in:
WRONG “McDonald’s has roughly a thousand restaurants in Canada” (77).
CORRECT Schlosser writes, “McDonald’s has roughly a thousand restaurants in Canada” (77).
CORRECT Schlosser added this comment: “McDonald’s has roughly a thousand
restaurants in Canada” (77).
Quotations without a lead-in are marked NIQ (No Isolated Quotes) by me. If the cited passage is longer than a few sentences, you should single-space the quoted material, indent it, and omit the double quotes around it. We use MLA endnote and bibliography form.